DesignedbyLara.com

Friday, January 28, 2011

My Underwhelming Experience While Reading KMM's Fever Series

One of the biggest series to hit the Paranormal, Romance, and I guess the Urban Fantasy genre is Karen Marie Moning’s Fever series. I’ve enjoyed Karen’s book in the past since they were straight up romance with larger than life heroes (Lusty Scots who reminded me of Jamie from the Outlander series. Och) and the heroines who think they’re lacking in redeeming qualities, but are adored and thought to be perfect by these lusty gimme an Och burly heroes that any women would tear off their kilts to get a taste of what they don’t wear underneath them.

When I heard Karen was going to start a new series that wasn’t a romance, but more along the lines of a paranormal mystery about a young woman who goes in search of her sister’s killer, I wasn’t interested in reading. When Darkfever came out, I didn’t pay much mind. But then as more books were published and the ultimate cliffhanger with Faefever and the electric Chapter 4 in Dreamfever, including the elusive, mysterious and cocky character of Barrons, that’s when I started to change my mind. When so many are so far gone over a series of books and the word “crack” is used, I think of JR Ward’s BDB series, which is my crack. So, two weeks before Shadowfever was published I started reading the first four books so by the time Shadowfever came out I’d be caught up on everything.

I’m warning all the Fever and Barrons fans that this post isn’t going to praise these books. So, if you are a hardcore lover of these books, you may want to stop reading here and move onto another blog that has big accolades of the Fever series. I’m in the minority because on a whole the Fever series was a big disappointment for me.


*waits as Bieber Fever girls.. oops I mean Barrons Fever girls leave to sigh over le Douche…*

Yes, that’s right, my nickname for Jericho Barrons is le Douche. When did I come to the conclusion that Barrons is a douche? Pretty much by the second book. But before I go on with my rant about Barrons le Douche, let’s start at the beginning with MacKayla Lane. MacKayla, who everyone calls Mac, lives in Ashford, Georgia with her parents. The twenty-two year old spends her days bartending, tanning hanging out with friends and is a proud girly-girl who has a pink fetish, loves doing her hair and nails and has no qualms that she’s beautiful. Her older sister Alina is in Dublin, Ireland studying at Trinity College. Mac’s entire world is about to go to hell in a hand basket one hot summer day when she finds out Alina has been killed. No one knows why Alina was murdered, and the authorities in Dublin pretty much close the case even before they can start to investigate. Mac refuses to let this be, especially since Alina left a frightened message on her cell phone a few hours before she was killed. Mac takes it upon herself to go over to Dublin and get answers. She owes it to Alina and herself to find out what happened.

Mac goes to Dublin without any real plan. The police can’t or won’t answers her questions and Alina’s teachers and fellow students have no clue about her whereabouts or who she hung out with because she began to cut class and became secretive. Alina had a lover named Darroc who has the power of the persuasive voice behind him. Mac believes Darroc (A character who has appeared in Moning's Highlander series) knows what may have happened to Alina, or he kiled her, but doesn’t want to be found. Mac is basically backed into a corner and it looks like Alina’s murder will never get solved. But then Mac starts seeing things that are not normal. Very freaky OMGWTFBBQ things.

Cutting to the chase here- Mac has the ability to see the Fae because she’s a sidhe-seer, from an ancient Celtic blood-line who can see the Fae. The Fae uses illusions, and there are different types, a cast system or sorts from the Seelie to the Unseelie and a whole bunch more that would take an entire semester of history class to understand. The wall between Man and Faery is coming down and Mac will be the one to stop it as she continues to find her sister’s killer and hunt a book called the Sinsar Dubh, a Fae relic that can possess humans. Mac meets Jericho Barrons, who runs Barrons Books and Baubles. Barrons doesn’t like Mac at all and keeps it just business between them by calling her Ms. Lane while she calls him Barrons. I call him Le Douche. Douche needs Mac because she’s the only one who can locate the Sinsar Dubh. Most of the action are these two searching for the demon book and Mac opening her eyes to the Fae around her, such as V’lane the prince of the Tuath De’ Danaan, a fine specimen of Fae who can literally kill you through too many orgasms during sex. Mac and V’lane become friends in a strange way while Barrons is always there taunting Mac and NEVER ANSWERING ANY QUESTIONS SHE HAS. Mac gets frustrated by Barrons’s aloofness and cruel demeanor while she fantasizes about his body, tattoos and his fast cars and bookstore she lusts after as much as she lust after him, but doesn't want the scary thing hiding under his garage that Barrons won’t say what it is because BARRONS DOESN’T ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS MAC ASKS HIM.

Slowly… oh so very slowly, Mac gets closer to the truth as she goes from cutesy Barbie doll Legally Blonde Elle Woods to black wearing, I’m going to kick some ass ala Linda Hamilton from Terminator 2. All the while she lusts after Barrons, who acts like Batman, appearing for short amounts of time to act snarky and rude to Mac knowing she’s practically in heat for him. I guess his snappish insults are like foreplay for them both.

I have three big issues why the Fever series didn’t work. The fact that Barrons le Douche refuses to answer any questions thrown his way by Mac is a poor attempt to keep the tension alive. It’s a throwback plot device that doesn’t work and is a weakness on the part of the author to keep the reader invested in finding the answers. Having Barrons act like a petulant spoiled boy, much like a douche, by refusing to give up anything is almost insulting. Also the screen time with Barrons is very minimal if you think of it. He comes and goes with no real purpose and I wonder if Karen’s original plans for Barrons wasn’t as important to the overall story arc who was transformed into a more important role based on readers’ reactions.


I had a big issue with Mac’s constant internalization. Shadowfever is very guilty of this. Mac is a wonderful character who grows in every single book even with the long winded inner monologues, while Barrons is stagnant. The excuse could be is because Barrons is thousands upon thousands of years old, but you think he’d have some therapeutic change based on Mac being in his life. I was waiting for that moment where Barrons does have that light bulb moment with Mac. Sorry, by him accepting Mac as his lover and showing through hot sex that she’s the one for him, is not good enough for me.

Finally, The Fever series as a whole is very watered down. I can appreciate the mythology of it all, but at times I felt this was very surface type reading. It may just be me, but I like more descriptive explanations and much of the action was glossed over. I had problems trying to get a handle on things and what was going on. I also felt poor Mac was being thrown in every which direction for no purpose (this happens a great deal in Shadowfever). And destroying a character’s psyche and spirit by constantly throwing horrible things at them such as a death of a loved one, being threatened, brutally raped and then being insulted left and right, is not a good enough or valid reason to show how your main character, such as Mac, can walk though the fires, be burned to a crisp and come out stronger than ever.

The Fever series just didn’t work for me. I could continue to go on with other reasons, including why I think Barrons is the perfect example of an abusive, manipulative emotionally stunted jerk, but that would take a whole other post. For what it’s worth, I do have to mention how the tone of Feminism is very strong in this series. At no point does Mac rely on a man to save her. Barrons doesn’t really come to her rescue at any point, unless you count the one time when he helps her bring her out of her Py’ra, the almost death by Fae sex (Which I kept thinking of She-Ra). But the again, it wasn’t a totally unselfish move on Barrons part either. Karen does make a great case for “Girl Power” in the form of Mac and the thirteen year old Dani who becomes Mac’s backup and her new found sister and sidhe warrior in arms.

How I wished I could have enjoyed these books, but they fell so flat for me. Also, this could have worked better as a trilogy than over five books. Bloodfever, book #2, doesn’t bring anything worthwhile to the series. I will say this, Karen does sure know how to write some great one-liners and dialogue. What may be the most effective line from all these books still sticks with me. It was first mentioned by Barrons in Dreamfever and brought up by Mac again toward the end of Shadowfever where Mac and Barrons finally are completely honest with one another. Barrons tells Mac she’ll find a man who will kiss her until she can’t breathe, where she’ll realize she doesn’t need air. Mac has found that with Barrons, and since the Fever series isn’t technically a romance, their HEA is the least likely normal one that should be expected, even if their road to their HEA was less than ideal for me.

For this reader, I very much had my breath the entire time while reading the Fever series and didn’t lose my breath once because of the overall lacking enjoyment I found as I read. (Delacorte)

My Final Grade for the Fever series as a whole: C

I welcome any opinions from those who have enjoyed these books, as well as those who are in my camp.

And please, give me one redeeming quality why Jericho "le Douche" Barrons is so beloved by readers?

Katiebabs

25 comments:

Erica Hayes said...

OMG. WHAT YOU SAID. DO NOT GET.

FInally, I am not the only one :) I respect that others love this series, but it just wasn't for me.

2 reasons:

1) Barrons is rude, boring, uncommunicative and condescending. I don't understand why Mac lusts after him, and I don't care what happens to him.

2) Umm... nothing does happen to him. Or to Mac. For at least 2.5 books, which is where I stopped reading. Slow build? Sorry. Too slow for short-attention-span moi.

Sigh. I guess I'm missing out :)

Some Like it Hot said...

I'm actually in agreement with you on this, and I skipped part of the review so as to not be spoiled for major plot lines of the book. Why? Because I've only finished book 1. My main problem with the book, beyond the fact that Mac is not the brightest bulb and I have no patience for that in female protagonists, is that there was way to much introspection. I've read tons of series where the book is written in first person and they do a way better job of shoring up the character and what is going on around them than this one does.

I'm going to read book to only because I need to see this series through, but swear to god if this chick doesn't wise up, I'm going to be done with it.

Lily of Darkness said...

You knew I would show up didn't you?

I loved the series.
I was one of the ones pushing you to read and telling you I thought it was great. I liked the slow build, I am one of those that likes the drawn out tension...like the eye conversations.

I did find lots of things lacking at times, in total agreement that he was like Batman, and he didn't tell her anything that would help her.

I liked how Karen summed him though in the line where he said:
"I'm not the hero, Mac. Never have been. Never will be. Let us be perfectly clear: I'm not the antihero, either, so quit waiting to discover my hidden potential. There's nothing to redeem me."

Penelope said...

Come on KB...don't hold back...tell us what you really think about Barrons.... :^)

All of your points are valid. I was willing to overlook the irritating problems because I found the story very compelling. I do have a problem with first person POV stories that have a clueless heroine...it makes it frustrating for the reader, because we're in the dark, too. (Katie MacAlister is very guilty of this problem).

Why I think this series is amazing is what makes any epic fantasy series amazing...a sparkling, creative, awe-inspiring story filled with jaw-dropping details, shocking plot twists, and an epic battle of good vs. evil with intriguing shades of gray. Yeah, Barrons was a douche. And Mac didn't actually save the day. But KMM created an unbelievable fantasy world that kicks total ass.

Sorry you weren't on board w/ that, but I wanna bang Roarke's head against the wall, so we're even.

Here's to douche-y heroes everywhere!

Serena said...

I've only read the first 2 books in this series, but I have the others and felt no desire to go back and pick them up yet. I think the main problem -- as you said -- is Barrons for me. He drives me knuts and I don't care about him...

Amber (aka BBB) said...

LOL. Also doing the 'I'm not alone in not loving this series' dance.

I liked some of the books more than others, but Mac actually annoyed me more than Barrons. Which is saying a lot.

What I couldn't stand, especially with the last book, but also the end of Faefever and beginnings of Dreamfever, where the 1st person PRESENT ramblings of Mac.

Hate that KMM kept switching tenses. She didn't do it well.

Blodeuedd said...

If I ever do red these books and do not like the, then at least I will know that I am not alone :)

KMont said...

Word, Babs. Word.

But...I think you should totally expand on why douche is so douchy to you lol!

Rhianna said...

THANK YOU KB! I bought the series for the hubs for Christmas 'cause his friend said they were awesome and he's not liking them much. I've had the same problem with the Cat & Bones books. Everyone loves them and I think they suck. Nice to see we can have a negative opinion, be honest about it and not be alone.

I don't think I want to read these, especially after reading your post here. I wasn't very interested before and even less so now.

heidenkind said...

Wellll, I love this series and I disagree. :) Although I do agree that nothing happened in Bloodfever, but there's always that one book in a series where nothing happens.

I can see where you're coming from with Barrons, because for the first two books I didn't see him as a romantic hero, or him and Mac getting together, at all. Mainly I just wanted to know what the heck he was. But he grew on me. I think the scene where he catches her dancing around BB&B was the turning point for me.

Also, maybe reading them all together was detriment rather than a plus for you. Like I said before, I'm not sure I would have enjoyed the series as much if I'd read it all at once--taking a break between books was definitely needed.

Sorry it didn't work for you! But, everyone's different.

Lynnd said...

I agree with you assessment of this series. Both Barrons and Mac annoyed me; however, like Amber, I found that Mac got on my nerves much more than Barrons. The world-building was interesting, but I agree that this series should have been completed in 3 books (at most) and I hated the cliffhanger endings.

mepamelia said...

I can totally get not liking these books, even though I would give them a solid B to B+ grade. I found them a little too relentless in the pacing. You make a good point about too much bad stuff happening just for the sake of badness.
I think why I REALLY REALLY REALLY like the Barrons character was that I thought his non-communicative ways were as much to try to keep Mac safe as to encourage her to toughen up and learn. He pushed and prodded at her to see if she could grow and be better. Admittedly I have a thing for not so noble heroes (ala Anne Stuart) but I think where Barrons might fall flat for a lot of readers is the 1st person disconnect. Maybe I inferred from his actions/words (as few and frustrating as they were) a larger character arc than was obvious. I'm a great fan of the 1st person narrative though, especially in scary books, because they raise the stakes immensely as the reader can only rely on the perceptions of one person. They're harder to pull off in romance because the trust in the HEA is never as strong.
That being said, I started Shadowfever and am on pause before page 100. I was not yet in the mood to read something that bambambam relentless if I couldn't devote a few uninterrupted hours to it. Hopefully this weekend. Who knows? By the time I finish it I might agree with your ultimate verdict on Barrons! Or he might remain on my swoonworthy list.

Julia Rachel Barrett said...

At the risk of life and limb, ICAM. I've been waiting for your review for some time. I really needed to hear this. I did not enjoy this series at all. In the beginning I had hoped that Barrons was the fae queen in disguise - I thought that theme had tremendous potential, but alas, it was not to be.
I'm glad Mack evolved, but boy...I think there has never been a series so pumped up that left me so deflated.

KB/KT Grant said...

Erica: You said it perfectly about Barrons. The 3 big traits the describe Douche to a tee is Boring, Uncommunicative and Condescending.

Some Like it Hot: I think it KMM had lightened up on Mac's internal monologue each book would have been tighter and more exciting. But I will say by SF, Mac was fed up and decided not to take any more crap from anyone.

Lily: I enjoy slow tension as well, it didn't build up as well as it should have, IMO. Barrons is definitely not a hero and more of an enigma.

Penelope: Me hold back? Nope! :P

We'll both call it even and call it a day, lover of the beard.

Serena: Ever want to smash a character's head against the wall? That's what I wanted to do with Barrons and feed him to the smoke monster under his garage.

Amber: No dance for me. I'm sitting in the corner and brooding about these books. :P

Blodeuedd: :)

Kmont: Oh how I could do a top 10 list why Barrons is the ultimate Douche.

Rhianna: At least Bones answers Cat's questions and doesn't vanish and leave her to the wolves to fend for herself.

Heidenkind: I wanted Mac to handcoff him to the bed, have her way with him and leave him there while she rode off in the sunset with one of his most beloved cars.

Lynnd: I don't mind the cliffhangers but not answering questions just because is an annoying pot device to pull the reader in emotionally. it just doesn't jive for me at all.

Mepamelia: I also think the problem I had with Barrons is he is too vague and not shown dimensionally enough. I wish we could get a little more perspective about him.

Julia: I'm waiting for both my arms and legs to be ripped to shreds based on this review, but I don't think KMM minds since SF is the #1 book this week in sales.

Deflated is a good word about the Fever books.

Dot S. said...

Thank You!!! With all the hype I thought I was the only one who was totally disappointed with this series. The characters annoyed as did the frequent streamof conciousness writing. I'm delighted to know that someone out in the blogosphere can speak their mind frankly.

KB/KT Grant said...

Dot S; I was so hoping to be blown away as well, but by the second book, I was very disappointed.

But what works for others, doesn't always work for some. Oh well. :)

TLL. said...

Thank you Katie!!! I saw so much hype for these books, esp. about Barrons, that I also read them about 2 weeks before Shadowfever came out. Barrons was definitely lacking for all the reasons you've pointed out. There's no growth to him at all. I kept reading it because I thought he would change. He's pretty much an ass hole, with the exception of maybe two scenes, through the entire series. Even more annoying was the fact that the series should have just been 3 books. One could definitely skip the second book and probably most of the third. A lot could have been condensed, ect. It just dragged on and on and on....

MsM (Elizabeth Jules Mason) said...

Oh dear!

I adore the series - its one of my ALL TIME favorite series! I've re-read it and plan to re-read it many more times because for me, its that good.
Sorry it didn't work for you.

:)

MsM

Kaetrin said...

I've just started listening to the series and now I've gone and bought them in ebook format too. I am enjoying them but I'm waiting to finish Shadowfever before giving the series a grade. I'm thinking of it really as one book in 5 parts rather than 5 books. So far, rated purely on my enjoyment (and that I am compelled to do more housework and/or exercise just so I can keep listening - what's up with that?) I'm rating the series B+.

It will depend on what happens at the end of SF and whether I get answers to MY questions as to whether it will keep that rating. LOL.

I can totally see your points though. It's not really about Barrons so I didn't expect him to grow. I think the growth is all Mac. I do get a little frustrated by the inner monologues and I'm getting really impatient to find out WHAT'S GOING ON, but the bits with Barrons and Mac are my favourite. As annoyed as I occasionally get by Barrons not answering Mac's questions, I get just as annoyed (if not more) by the things Mac DOESN'T ask him about - frex, who was the lady he carried out of the mirror in Bk3 and did her kill her? He does answer SOME of her questions... just, not many.

As much as I can see that it wouldn't work for everyone, I'm hooked I'm afraid. I'm a person who can't bear not to know what happens at the end and that, if nothing else (and there is (for me) more than that) will keep me glued to the end.

I am thinking it's a guilty pleasure however - it's not like it's high art or anything. *grin*

orannia said...

I haven't read this series yet, and know people who love it and know others who don't. I think with all the other good books I have to read I won't tackle this series any time soon.

... such as V’lane the prince of the Tuath De’ Danaan, a fine specimen of Fae who can literally kill you through too many orgasms during sex.

If I have to go, that doesn't sounds like a bad way... :)

Angela said...

This is one of my favorite series, I've re-read it many times and savored the reading of Shadowfever - going so far as to do a read-along with a good friend of mine.

For me, Barrons wasn't about giving answers, he was about her finding them. Accepting what is and dealing with it. While I was as frustrated as Mac a lot of the time, a lot of the things Barrons didn't tell her had more to do with him than with what she was actually dealing with. He had no reason to suspect, for a long time, that she was something other than someone who could sense the Sinsar Dubh. In which case all she needed to know is that she had to find it, the LM was bad, and to not trust any fae - which was good advice, no?

I loved Barrons. I accepted him as he was. This line was one of my favorites: "I'm not the hero, Mac. Never have been. Never will be. Let us be perfectly clear: I'm not the antihero, either, so quit waiting to discover my hidden potential. There's nothing to redeem me." He accepted himself, made no excuses for himself, and was still extremely noble. Is he commutative? No, not really. But he was the one that was always there to save her. I disagree that he never came to her rescue except when she was Pri-ya. He came to get her in the Silvers as the Beast, he came to get her in the Burren, he came to get her in the Abbey. Not only that, he was the one that supported her. In fact, he gave Mac quite a lot of leeway to take the path she needed to take. It didn't always coincide with his path, but he still helped her to travel it. As for change in Barrons? Well, I'll be honest, I loved that he didn't change fundamentally. That he didn't start spouting 'I love yous', and that he quite simply stated that she was something he would not live without. Oh, and I loved the scene where Mac finds out about who killed Alina and Barrons and she talk in the bookstore. LOVE it.

I loved Mac's growth in the series, I loved seeing that nothing could keep her down, that she was going to fight through anything. Was it a lot? Yes, it was, but I never felt like it was there just for the sake of being there. Same thing for me with the internalization. Mac had a lot to deal with, a lot of shocks and things going on, I think I would have found it weird if she didn't spend time thinking about it.

Perhaps it's because I started reading them from the release of Darkfever, I don't know honestly. But I never felt like there were too many words in this series. I felt like the growth and development of both Mac and the subtleties of the world and people in it needed the time they took to fully develop. I have gone through this series many times and each time I've been able to pull out clues and hints and thoughts and ideas that all lead towards the end.

I knew when I first started this series that it wasn't going to be for everyone, but I'm glad that it's still one of my all-time favorites. I can't wait to read it again.

I've rambled, and am not sure I make much sense. Now I'm kinda blushing for how much I've talked.

KB/KT Grant said...

TTL: A big issue is lack of growth. There seem to be such an emphasis on all the changes going on in Dublin, but not enough action, or so it seemed to me.

MsM: More Barrons for you! ;)

Kaetrin: I'm still waiting to know who Barrons brougth out of the mirror!

Orannia: If I had to go also, I'd pick V'lane.

Angela: I think in the beginning KMM has a specific plan for Barrons and she ventured off that plan. For the life of me I can't understand why everyone is so swoony about Barrons. Right from the start he was too standoffish for me to enjoy like everyone else.

A Buckeye Girl Reads said...

I loved this series, but have to admit, it took me a bit to warm up to Mac. This series was just so different then her Highlander one that it was hard to grasp in the beginning.

I think sometimes when a series is so hyped, our expectations are just way too high and we're doomed not to like it. With Barrons, I get why you don't like him-but I liked how he made her figure out stuff by herself. There's nothing worse then a heroine having the hero do everything for her.

Shay said...

Everyone makes some good points here. But what does the author herself have to say about the series?
http://karenmariemoning.blogspot.com/2011/01/notes-on-fever-series-spoilers.html

(I'm sorry if we aren't allowed to post links:))

Anonymous said...

Barrons would be like... really, really? Did you just dis something that could utterly destroy you in less of a fraction of a second? Just saying, he is a beast. And his name is Barrons like come on, he is a masculine machine that drives mac, and you nuts throughout the books. If you are implying him being Le Douche you may say yes he is clean yet if he got cha.. he'd still be clean prolly' not a swell chance a droplet would hit his nice tailcoat, hes a bad ass. I do acknowledge this evidence of what you seem flawed was his elusive behavior that lead to a more characterized individual, I've met quite a few people who are strong, yet humble enough to keep their business, even dark, away from you.

<3 Danni's Buddy